Physics Problems Q&A - Recent questions and answers in Physics Problems
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=qa/physics-problems
Powered by Question2AnswerThermal stress in a bar.
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3450/thermal-stress-in-a-bar
<blockquote><p>Suppose a bar of length $L$, Young Modulus $Y$, temperature coefficient $\alpha$ is at temperature $T_o$ is just held between two walls. Now temperature increases, to make a change in temperature $\triangle T$ (measured from initial $T_o$). My book says thermal stress developed is $Y\alpha\triangle T$.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>My question:</p>
<p>As the rod is rigidly held, walls will not let rod to changes its length further from $L$, for this it applies force $F$. Its original length at $T_o+\triangle T$ would have been $L(1+\alpha\triangle T)$, if walls were not present, hence it causes $\triangle L=l\alpha\triangle T$.</p>
<p>So $Y=\dfrac{F_{T_f}\cdot L_{T_f}}{A\cdot\triangle L}\tag*{1}$ where $T_f$ signifies their respective values at final temperature. Putting these it gives to me themal stress as, $$\sigma=\dfrac{Y\alpha\triangle T}{1+\alpha\triangle T} $$.</p>
<p>If I were to put $L_{T_f}=L$ then this gives what my book says, but we should apply $\text{eq. 1}$ and put everything at the same temperature, so why putting its length as $L$ mandatory. Please help.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3450/thermal-stress-in-a-barFri, 19 Apr 2019 14:25:06 +0000Answered: Container filled with fluid move with a acceleration a
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3446/container-filled-with-fluid-move-with-a-acceleration-a&show=3449#a3449
<p>Your calculation is correct so far but it is not complete.</p>
<p>In the vertical direction there is a gravitational field of strength $g$ acting downwards. This is equivalent to an acceleration upwards at rate $g$. The acceleration of the ball relative to the container is $a_y=3g$ upwards.</p>
<p>In the horizontal direction the ball accelerates at $a_x$ <em>relative to the container</em>. This is different from the acceleration of the container itself. The ball must cover twice the distance in the same time. Since $s \propto a$ and $a_y=3g$ then we must have $a_x=6g$.</p>
<p>The final step which you have missed is to relate $a_x$ (the acceleration of the ball relative to the container) to the acceleration $a$ of the container. As in the vertical direction we have $a_x=3a=6g$. Therefore $a=2g$. </p>
<p>The time for the ball to reach the edge of the container is $\sqrt{\frac{L}{3g}}$ as you calculated. So the answers are options B, C.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3446/container-filled-with-fluid-move-with-a-acceleration-a&show=3449#a3449Fri, 19 Apr 2019 05:54:57 +0000time required to pass electricity through electroplating bath
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3447/time-required-pass-electricity-through-electroplating-bath
<p>The time required to pass 3600 Coulomb of electricity through an electroplating bath using a current of 200 mA is <strong><strong>__</strong></strong>_ hours</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3447/time-required-pass-electricity-through-electroplating-bathWed, 17 Apr 2019 03:09:40 +0000Answered: Increasing resistance with temperature.
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3432/increasing-resistance-with-temperature&show=3445#a3445
<p>The power delivered to the bulb is $P=V^2/R$. Assuming there are no heat losses, the power delivered to the bulb is related to the temperature increase of the filament by $P=c\frac{dT}{dt}$ where $c$ is the heat capacity of the bulb and $T$ is the temperature increase. Following your suggestion I shall model the variation of resistance with temperature as $R=R_0e^{\alpha T}$ where temperature $T=0$ at time $t=0$. Then $$\frac{dt}{dT}=\frac{cR_0}{V^2}e^{\alpha T}$$ which can be integrated to get $$t=\frac{cR_0}{\alpha V^2}(e^{\alpha T}-1)$$ For small values of $T$ such that $\alpha T \ll 1$ we get the approximation $$t\approx \frac{cR_0}{V^2}T$$</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3432/increasing-resistance-with-temperature&show=3445#a3445Mon, 15 Apr 2019 17:28:00 +0000Answered: Minimum force required to rotate a lamina when there is friction
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3433/minimum-force-required-to-rotate-lamina-when-there-friction&show=3444#a3444
<p>This is quite difficult to solve but the result is fairly simple. Possibly there is an easier solution but I do not see it.</p>
<p>The friction force between the lamina and the rough ground is spread uniformly over the lamina. The force per unit area is $\sigma=\frac{\mu W}{A}$ where $W, A$ are the weight and surface area of the lamina and $\mu$ is the coefficient of friction.</p>
<p>Using polar co-ordinates with the fixed vertex as origin, the element of area is $dA=rdrd\theta$. The force on the element is $dF=\sigma dA$. The moment about the origin of the friction force on this element is $dM=rdF$. </p>
<p>If $p$ is the closest distance from the origin of the side of the lamina which does not pass through the origin, then the maximum distance from the origin at polar angle $\theta$ is $p\sec\theta$. The total moment of friction about the vertex is $$M=\sigma \int \int_0^{p\sec\theta} r^2drd\theta=\frac13 \sigma p^3\int \sec^3\theta d\theta$$ $$=\frac16 \sigma p^3 [\sec\theta \tan\theta+\ln|\sec\theta+\tan\theta|]$$ </p>
<p>See <a rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_of_secant_cubed">Integral of Secant Cubed</a>. The limits of integration are $\theta_1, \theta_2$.<br>
<img src="https://i.imgur.com/8vyYA3N.png" alt=""><br>
Suppose the triangle has vertices ABC with side lengths $a< b< c$. With the axis at vertex A we have $$p=b, \theta_1=0, \sec\theta_1=1, \tan\theta_1=0, \sec\theta_2=\frac{c}{b}, \tan\theta_2=\frac{a}{b}$$ $$M_A=\frac16 \sigma [abc+b^3\ln(\frac{a+c}{b})]$$ Likewise when vertex B is the axis $$M_B=\frac16 \sigma [abc+a^3\ln(\frac{b+c}{a})]$$ For vertex C $$p=ab/c, \sec\theta_1=a/p, \tan\theta_1=a^2/cp, \sec\theta_2=b/p, \tan\theta_2=b^2/cp$$ $$c^3M_C=\frac16 \sigma [b^3(abc+a^3\ln(\frac{b+c}{a})+a^3(abc+b^3\ln(\frac{a+c}{b}))]=a^3M_A+b^3M_B$$ </p>
<p>The moment of friction is balanced by the moment of the applied force. When the axis is at vertices A, B the applied force is minimum when this force is applied at B, A respectively and it is perpendicular to AB; the moments are then $M_A=cF_A, M_B=cF_B$. When the axis is at vertex C the applied force is minimum when applied at A perpendicular to AC; then $M_C=bF_C$. Therefore $$bc^2F_C=a^3F_A+b^3F_B$$</p>
<p>In the question $\theta$ equals angle A so $$F_C=F_A\tan\theta \sin^2\theta +F_B\cos^2\theta $$</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3433/minimum-force-required-to-rotate-lamina-when-there-friction&show=3444#a3444Fri, 12 Apr 2019 21:02:01 +0000Answered: Calculating equivalent capacitance.
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3442/calculating-equivalent-capacitance&show=3443#a3443
<p>The middle diagram shows the correct equivalent configuration. </p>
<p>The diagram on the right assumes that the potential is the same at all points of the interface between the upper and lower dielectrics. If this is true then the interface can indeed be replaced by a conducting plate and the upper dielectric becomes a single capacitor, as suggested in the right-hand diagram. </p>
<p>However, the interface is a dielectric surface not a conducting surface, so it need not be at the same potential at all points adjacent to each of the two lower dielectrics. The lower surface of the upper dielectric can be split into two surfaces which can be at different potentials. This is recognised in the middle diagram. </p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3442/calculating-equivalent-capacitance&show=3443#a3443Fri, 12 Apr 2019 18:12:45 +0000Answered: Velocity of image of submerged object when liquid surface moves
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3437/velocity-image-submerged-object-when-liquid-surface-moves&show=3440#a3440
<p>Suppose the observer is a fixed distance $H$ above the coin. Then the distance from the observer to the water surface is $H-h$ and the apparent distance of the coin below the surface is $\frac34 h$. So the apparent distance of the coin from the observer (measuring downwards) is $$y=(H-h)+\frac34h=H-\frac14h$$</p>
<p>The velocity of the water surface is $\frac{dh}{dt}=+8m/s$ (plus because $h$ is increasing) so the rate at which the image of the coin is moving downwards (in the direction of increasing y) is $$\frac{dy}{dt}=-\frac14\frac{dh}{dt}=-2m/s$$ The minus sign indicates that the image is moving upwards towards the observer, whereas y increases downwards.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3437/velocity-image-submerged-object-when-liquid-surface-moves&show=3440#a3440Mon, 08 Apr 2019 16:12:29 +0000Given the vector current density, determine the total current flowing outward through a circular band
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3431/current-density-determine-current-flowing-outward-circular
<p>Given the vector current density, determine the total current flowing outward through a circular band.:</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/klQAo.png"><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/klQAo.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>
<p>The answer should be 518A. It comes something around 3255 A. Where is the mistake?</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/g1T1l.jpg"><img src="https://i.stack.imgur.com/g1T1l.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3431/current-density-determine-current-flowing-outward-circularFri, 29 Mar 2019 11:20:51 +0000Nucleon-Nucleon Scattering
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3430/nucleon-nucleon-scattering
<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/hZhT97F.png[/img]" alt=""><br>
<img src="https://i.imgur.com/rklrj0w.jpg[/img]" alt=""></p>
<p>I computed the orbital angular momentum classically, and then used quantum mechanics. But I am not convinced of what I got, because $L \alpha \sqrt{E}$ is a proportional equation that does not justify that when E < 20 MeV you get L ~ 0 (I do not see, numerically speaking, the difference between either plugging 20 MeV or 19MeV).</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3430/nucleon-nucleon-scatteringWed, 27 Mar 2019 12:38:33 +0000Answered: How to apply the gauss law when charge density is a function of not only $r$?
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3416/how-apply-the-gauss-law-when-charge-density-function-not-only&show=3428#a3428
<p>In general the electric potential (or electric field) at point P outside of a charge distribution can be expanded as a power series known as a <strong>multipole expansion</strong> : $$V(z)=\frac{A}{r}+\frac{B}{r^2}+\frac{C}{r^3}+\frac{D}{r^4}+...$$ where the coefficients $A, B, C, D, ...$ depend on the spherical polar and azimuthal co-ordinates $\theta, \phi$ and $r$ is the distance of P from centre O of the charge distribution. See <a rel="nofollow" href="http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3393/electric-field-far-away-of-a-bunch-of-charges">Electric field far away from a bunch of charges</a>.</p>
<p>In this case the total charge on the sphere is zero : $$Q=\int_0^R \int_0^{\pi} \rho r^2\sin\theta d\theta dr=KR\int_0^R (R-2r) dr \int_0^{\pi}\sin^2\theta d\theta=0$$ because the integral wrt $r$ is zero. So the electric potential far from the centre of the sphere will not be proportional to $1/r$ as it is for a point charge : that is, $A=0$ here. </p>
<p>It is convenient to divide the sphere into rings such as A and B which are parallel to the xy plane, because such rings have uniform charge density. A typical ring has radius $y=r\sin\theta$ and each point on it is the same distance $s$ from the point of interest P which lies on the $z$ axis. The potential at P due to the ring is simply $V=kQ/s$ where $k$ is Coulomb's constant,</p>
<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/rIu95cR.png" alt=""></p>
<p>Using the Cosine Rule for ring A $$s^2=z^2-2rz\cos\theta+r^2=z^2(1-x)$$ where $x=p(c-p), c=2\cos\theta, p=\frac{r}{z}$. The charge on each ring is $$dQ=2\pi y \rho r d\theta dr=2\pi\rho r^2\sin\theta d\theta dr$$ </p>
<p>Ring B has the same charge as ring A and is located symmetrically about O, the centre of the sphere. The potential at P due to both rings A and B, each with charge $dQ$, is $$dV=\frac{dQ}{4\pi \epsilon_0 }(\frac{1}{s_1}+\frac{1}{s_2})=\frac{KR(R-2r)}{2\epsilon_0 z}(\frac{1}{\sqrt{1- x}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+ x}})\sin^2\theta d\theta dr$$ </p>
<p>The reciprocals can be expanded as power series : $$\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-x}}=1+\frac12x+\frac38x^2+\frac{5}{16}x^3+\frac{35}{128}x^4+\frac{63}{256}x^5+\frac{231}{1024}x^6+...$$ $$\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+x}}=1-\frac12x+\frac38x^2-\frac{5}{16}x^3+\frac{35}{128}x^4-\frac{63}{256}x^5+\frac{231}{1024}x^6+...$$ which have the half-sum $$\frac12 (\frac{1}{\sqrt{1-x}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{1+x}})=1+\frac38x^2+\frac{35}{128}x^4++\frac{231}{1024}x^6+...$$ </p>
<p>The advantage of taking 2 rings together is that we have halved the number of terms in the series. This simplifies calculation. To avoid double-counting we must reduce the range of integration to $\theta=0 \to \pi/2$.</p>
<p>The words "far from the centre" suggest that we should assume $z\gg R$ and therefore we ignore all except the lowest power terms. Substituting from above $$x^2=p^2(c-p)^2\approx \frac{r^2}{z^2}\cos^2\theta$$ </p>
<p>The potential at P is approximately $$V\approx \frac{KR}{\epsilon_0 z} \int_0^{\pi/2} d\theta \int_0^R dr . (R-2r)(1+\frac38 \frac{r^2}{z^2} \cos^2 \theta ) \sin^2\theta$$ $$= \frac{KR}{\epsilon_0 z} \int_0^R (R-2r)\frac38 \frac{r^2}{z^2} dr \int_0^{\pi/2} \cos^2 \theta \sin^2\theta d\theta$$ $$= \frac{KR}{\epsilon_0 z} (-\frac{R^4}{16z^2} )(\frac{\pi}{16})$$ $$= -\frac{\pi KR^5}{256\epsilon_0 z^3}$$ The electric field at point P is $$E_z=-\frac{dV}{dz}=-\frac{3\pi KR^5}{256\epsilon_0 z^4}$$</p>
<p><strong>Notes :</strong> </p>
<ol>
<li><p>We should expect the potential to be -ve because the outer part of the sphere (which is closest to P) is negatively charged. </p>
</li>
<li><p>The dominant term in the charge distribution is not a <em>dipole</em> $V\propto 1/r^2$ but a <em>quadrupole</em> $V\propto 1/r^3$. We should expect to lose the dipole term because the centres of +ve and -ve charge coincide. </p>
</li>
<li><p>This result gives only the leading term in the <strong>multipole expansion</strong> and applies only for $z\gg R$. We could obtain more terms by retaining powers of $x^4, x^6...$ in the half-sum expansion and higher powers of $r$ when substituting for $x$. As more terms are retained the result becomes more accurate for smaller values of $z \gt R$.</p>
</li>
</ol>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3416/how-apply-the-gauss-law-when-charge-density-function-not-only&show=3428#a3428Tue, 26 Mar 2019 16:51:47 +0000Where do I make the approximations in this proton and electron collision problem?
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3407/where-make-approximations-proton-electron-collision-problem
<blockquote><p>A proton moving with a velocity $\beta c$ collides with a stationary electron of mass $m$ and knocks it off at an angle $\theta$ with the incident direction. Show that the energy imparted to the electron is approximately $$T \approx \frac{2\beta^2 \cos^2\theta}{1-\beta^2\cos^2\theta}mc^2$$</p>
</blockquote>
<p><em>Link to question :</em><br>
<a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/proton-moving-velocity-collides-stationary-electron-mass-m-knocks-angle-incident-direction-q35643739?trackid=VRP2b2Jt">https://www.chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/proton-moving-velocity-collides-stationary-electron-mass-m-knocks-angle-incident-direction-q35643739?trackid=VRP2b2Jt</a></p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3407/where-make-approximations-proton-electron-collision-problemSun, 17 Mar 2019 04:34:00 +0000Answered: Maximum charge and maximum current
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3406/maximum-charge-and-maximum-current&show=3414#a3414
<p>This problem can be solved by two methods : (A) using conservation of flux linkage and energy, and (B) using differential equations.</p>
<p>What you are missing in your solution is the conservation of energy. No energy is lost because there is no resistance in the circuit after the battery is disconnected. </p>
<p>(<strong>Note :</strong> With the type of switch depicted in the diagram, the circuit is broken - although only for a short time. The current through $L_1$ cannot then flow. This causes a large back emf and a spark across the switch, losing most of the energy stored in the inductor. To avoid loss of energy the switch needs to be smooth, with a small amount of overlap, so that there is never a break in the circuit containing the inductor.)</p>
<p><strong>How the Circuit Behaves</strong></p>
<p>While the switch is in position 1 there is a current $i_0=E/r$ flowing through $L_1$ and (presumably) none through $L_2$. It is possible that a sinusoidal current flows around circuit QRUT before the switch is thrown. However, we are not told anything about this so we must assume that there was initially no current in $L_2$.</p>
<p>When the switch is changed to position 2 the current $i_0$ continues to flow through $L_1$ - it cannot change instantaneously. For the same reason current cannot flow through $L_2$ immediately - it takes time to build up. Instead, all of the current from $L_1$ flows initially onto the capacitor. </p>
<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/ZZgJrs6.png" alt=""></p>
<p>There is initially no voltage across either inductor or the capacitor. As charge $q$ builds up on the capacitor there is an increasing voltage across all 3 components. This voltage increases the (upward) current $i_2$ through $L_2$ and decreases the (downward) current $i_1$ through $L_1$. </p>
<p>When the charge (and voltage) on the capacitor reaches a maximum, no more current flows into the capacitor. At this instant the current through $L_2$ is the same as that through $L_1$ - ie $i_1=i_2$ - because no current flows into or out of circuit PQTS. You can find the (maximum) charge on the capacitor at this instant using conservation of energy.</p>
<p>Although the charge and voltage on the capacitor then both decrease, this voltage continues to increase the (upward) current in $L_2$ and to decrease the (downward) current in $L_1$ until the charge on the capacitor becomes zero again. The current through $L_2$ is then a maximum because the polarity of the capacitor then switches, the voltage on it reverses, and this reduces the (upward) current $i_2$ while also increasing downward current $i_1$. By applying the conservation of energy again you can find the maximum current through $L_2$.</p>
<p><strong>(A) Solution using Conservation of Energy</strong></p>
<p>When the switch is thrown the current through $L_1$ is $i_0=E/r$. (This notation differs from yours.) Flux linkage is conserved in loop PQTS because this loop contains only inductors. When the currents in $L_1, L_2$ are generally $i_1, i_2$ we can write $$L_1i_0=L_1i_1+L_2i_2$$ </p>
<p>When the charge on the capacitor is a maximum $q_0$ then $i_1=i_2$ so $(L_1+L_2)i_1=L_1i_0$. By conservation of energy we can write $$L_1i_0^2=L_1i_1^2+L_2i_2^2+\frac{1}{C}q^2=(L_1+L_2)i_1^2+\frac{1}{C}q_0^2=\frac{L_1^2}{L_1+L_2}i_0^2+\frac{1}{C}q_0^2$$ $$q_0^2=\frac{CL_1L_2}{L_1+L_2}i_0^2$$ As we shall find later we can write this in the form $$q_0=\frac{i_0}{\omega}$$ where $\omega$ is the angular frequency of oscillations in the circuit.</p>
<p>When the charge on the capacitor becomes zero again ($q=0$) then the current through $L_2$ reaches its maximum value $i_3$. Equations for the conservation of flux linkage and energy then become $$L_1i_0=L_1i_1+L_2i_3$$ $$L_1i_0^2=L_1i_1^2+L_2i_3^2=L_1i_0^2-2L_2i_0i_3+\frac{L_2^2}{L_1}i_3^2+L_2i_3^2$$ $$0=[(\frac{L_2}{L_1}+1)i_3-2i_0]L_2i_3$$ We have already met one solution $i_3=0$; the other solution is $$i_3=\frac{2L_1}{L_1+L_2}i_0$$ We can go on to find the <strong>minimum current</strong> through $L_1$ which is $$i_4=\frac{L_1-L_2}{L_1+L_2}i_0$$</p>
<p><strong>(B) Solution using Differential Equations</strong></p>
<p>The voltage across the components in the circuit are related to the currents and charges by $$V=-L_1\frac{di_1}{dt}=L_2\frac{di_2}{dt}=\frac{1}{C}q$$ $$i_1-i_2=\frac{dq}{dt}$$ From these we get the equations $$L_1i_1+L_2i_2=L_1i_0$$ $$\frac{d^2q}{dt^2}+\omega^2 q=0$$ $$\omega^2=\frac{1}{C}(\frac{1}{L_1}+\frac{1}{L_2})$$ with the solutions $$q=q_0\sin\omega t$$ $$(L_1+L_2)i_1=L_1i_0+L_2\frac{dq}{dt}=L_1i_0+L_2\omega q_0\cos\omega t$$ $$(L_1+L_2)i_2=L_1i_0-L_2\frac{dq}{dt}=L_1i_0-L_1\omega q_0\cos\omega t$$ Substitute $i_1=i_0$ when $t=0$ into the 1st eqn to get $$i_0=\omega q_0$$ We can then write general solutions for the currents as $$i_1=i_0\frac{L_1}{L_1+L_2}(1+\frac{L_2}{L_1}\cos\omega t)$$ $$i_2=i_0\frac{L_1}{L_1+L_2}(1-\cos\omega t)$$ The minimum current through $L_1$ and the maximum current through $L_2$ are respectively $$i_4=\frac{L_1-L_2}{L_1+L_2}i_0$$ $$i_3=\frac{2L_1}{L_1+L_2}i_0$$</p>
<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/OBmwT1g.png" alt=""></p>
<p><strong>Notes :</strong></p>
<ol>
<li><p>The current $i_2$ through $L_2$ always has a minimum of zero and is always positive (upward in the diagram). </p>
</li>
<li><p>Unlike $i_2$, the current $i_1$ through $L_1$ <strong>can become negative</strong> (flow upwards in the diagram). This happens if $L_1 \lt L_2$.</p>
</li>
<li><p>The charge on the capacitor is a maximum (both polarities) when the same current flows through both inductors - ie $i_1=i_2$.</p>
</li>
<li><p>When this happens the current through both inductors equals half the maximum current through $L_2$ - ie $$i_1=i_2=\frac{L_1}{L_1+L_2}i_0=\frac12 i_3$$ </p>
</li>
</ol>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3406/maximum-charge-and-maximum-current&show=3414#a3414Sat, 16 Mar 2019 18:41:11 +0000Answered: Problem 5.13 Griffiths; Balancing magnetic attraction with electrical repulsion
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3412/griffiths-balancing-magnetic-attraction-electrical-repulsion&show=3413#a3413
<p>The line charges must have some mass. Because of this it is impossible to accelerate them to the speed of light. </p>
<p>Increasing their speed also increases their inertia. Initially almost all of the work done increases their speed and almost none increases their inertia. As their speed approaches the speed of light, almost all of the work done on them increases their inertia and there is little increase in speed.</p>
<p>So their speed will always be less than the speed of light, although you can get as close to $c$ as you wish.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3412/griffiths-balancing-magnetic-attraction-electrical-repulsion&show=3413#a3413Thu, 14 Mar 2019 19:29:11 +0000Griffiths 5.4 Force on a square loop
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3404/griffiths-5-4-force-on-a-square-loop
<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/HckbPJf.png[/img]" alt=""></p>
<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/9SEg3Li.png[/img]" alt=""></p>
<p>Before doing any calculation, I see the net force being zero;</p>
<p>$$ F_{AB} = -F_{CD}$$</p>
<p>$$ F_{BC} = -F_{DA}$$ </p>
<p>But apparently this is not the case. The provided solution is:</p>
<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/75ijztI.png[/img]" alt=""></p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3404/griffiths-5-4-force-on-a-square-loopSat, 09 Mar 2019 11:53:06 +0000How to induce large current in flexible wire and explaining how does it stretch into a circle
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3401/induce-large-current-flexible-explaining-does-stretch-circle
<blockquote><p>The idea is to explain how could we induce current in a flexible loop using an initially free-of-current wire.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>Some background.</strong></p>
<p>The current has to be the same all the way around (otherwise charge would be gathered at some point and in that accumulation of charge, the electric field would point in a way that the flow would even out). </p>
<p>The two forces involved in driving the current around the loop are the source force (typically a battery) and the electrostatic force, which smooths out the flow. The line integral of the vector sum of the previous forces is known as electromotive force (emf).</p>
<p><strong>My answer to the problem</strong> </p>
<p>My difficulty in this problem is that I do not have clear the sketch. I would say that the following happens:</p>
<p>Imagine that the loop is in the xy plane. The velocity of the current is tangential to the loop and its direction is clockwise; $B$ will point in the $-z$ direction and the force will point radially outwards. This force would be the source one (provided by the battery and the one that does work to move the loop; I know magnetic force does no work; the individual radial vectors of the force do work but the net work done by all of them is zero) if the wire were just connected to a battery. I also understand that the net electrostatic force is zero (this is a closed path).</p>
<p>But here there is no battery, the current is induced by a change in the current of the wire</p>
<p>My intuition tells me that is the change in the current of the wire what changes the flux of the wire and the changing flux induces the emf in the loop. But not really sure of this...</p>
<p><strong>What's the nature of the induced current in the loop?</strong></p>
<p><strong>EDIT:</strong> The original exercise does not provide details on the set up, but my interpretation was the following: we start with two free-of-current wires: one is a loop, the other a straight line. We apply current on the straight wire, which induces an emf on the loop (which will stretch into a circle; this idea came from one of the sources I checked: <a rel="nofollow" href="https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/239591/magnetic-potential-energy">https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/239591/magnetic-potential-energy</a> ).</p>
<p>Souces:</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/239591/magnetic-potential-energy">https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/239591/magnetic-potential-energy</a></p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/266895/what-force-causes-the-induced-emf-of-a-loop-and-the-difference-between-a-loop?rq=1">https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/266895/what-force-causes-the-induced-emf-of-a-loop-and-the-difference-between-a-loop?rq=1</a></p>
<p>Introduction to Electrodynamics by David Griffiths</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3401/induce-large-current-flexible-explaining-does-stretch-circleFri, 08 Mar 2019 16:08:33 +0000Answered: Questions from a jumping kangaroo
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3263/questions-from-a-jumping-kangaroo&show=3400#a3400
<p>A general algorithm which works for all functions $f(x)$ will have to use a <strong>numerical method</strong> of solution - ie start with an initial approximation to the trajectory, estimate how close this comes to the optimal solution (the "error"), use this to make an adjustment to the solution, estimate the new "error," and continue the same cycle until the "error" is small enough for your purposes.</p>
<p><strong>Analytic solutions</strong> in the form of closed functions are possible only for particular shapes of $f(x)$ such as rectangles, circles, and ellipses.</p>
<p>If the object is convex and has a vertical plane of symmetry then you can use the method in my answer to <a rel="nofollow" href="https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/288193/">Minimum speed required to clear rectangular object</a>. This involves finding points A, B on the same horizontal level, at which the projectile could graze the obstacle at an angle of $45^{\circ}$ to the horizontal. The distance AB enables you to find the required speed at these points, and the height of AB above the ground enables you to find the minimum speed with which the object should be launched.</p>
<p>This appears to be the method which you are using in your calculation.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3263/questions-from-a-jumping-kangaroo&show=3400#a3400Mon, 04 Mar 2019 16:03:59 +0000Answered: Force that one half of uniformly charged solid sphere exerts on other half - Griffith 2.43
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3368/force-uniformly-charged-solid-sphere-exerts-other-griffith&show=3399#a3399
<p><img src="https://imgur.com/yKhoEy9" alt=""></p>
<blockquote><p>The problem asks to calculate the force on one part due to other. But the electric field I'm using to do this calculation is the result E of complete solid non-conducting sphere. <strong>So why are we considering E of the northern hemisphere to calculate force it experience from the southern hemisphere?</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is a very good question.</p>
<p>One way of finding the total electrostatic force on the N hemisphere is to calculate the vector force $F_{ij}=k q_i q_j / r_{ij}^2$ on every charge $q_i$ in the N hemisphere due to every charge $q_j$ in the S hemisphere, then take the vector sum of all forces $F_{ij}$ : </p>
<p>$$F_N=\sum_{i \in N} \sum_{j \in S} F_{ij}$$</p>
<p>This double sum or integral is very difficult to calculate, for two reasons : </p>
<ol>
<li><p>the general expression for the force $F_{ij}$ between every pair of 2 charges is a complicated function using the Cartesian co-ordinate system. even more so when using spherical co-ordinates ;</p>
</li>
<li><p>each of the 2 charges $q_i, q_j$ in every pair has 3 co-ordinates, so in total there will be a sum ranging over 6 possible co-ordinates. </p>
</li>
</ol>
<p>An alternative method of solution (used in Jorge Daniel's answer) is to sum the <strong>total</strong> electrical force $F_i$ on each charge $q_i$ in the N hemisphere due to <strong>all</strong> of the charges in <strong>both</strong> the S and N hemispheres : </p>
<p>$$F_N=\sum_{i \in N} F_i=\sum_{i \in N} \sum_{j \in N,S} F_{ij}$$ </p>
<p>Whereas $F_{ij}$ is a very complicated expression, the total force $F_i$ on each charge is very much simpler because it is known to be radial and depends only on the radial distance of the charge $q_i$ from the centre of the sphere. </p>
<p>As you rightly point out, this means that within the expression for $F_i$ we will include the force $F_{ij}$ on charge $q_i$ due to other charges $q_j$ which are <strong>also in the N hemisphere</strong>. </p>
<p>However, if charge $q_j$ is also within the N hemisphere ($j \in N$), then when we take the sum over all charges $q_i$ in the N hemisphere ($i \in N$), this sum will include not only $F_{ij}$ but also the equal and opposite force $F_{ji}$ acting on $q_j$ due to charge $q_i$. These 2 contributions to the total force on all particles in the N hemisphere will cancel out because $F_{ij}=-F_{ji}$. </p>
<p>On the other hand, if charge $q_j$ is in the S hemisphere ($j \in S$) then the force $F_{ji}$ will <strong>not</strong> be included in the first summation over $i \in N$.</p>
<p>See <a rel="nofollow" href="https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/23071/">Find the net force the southern hemisphere of a uniformly charged sphere exerts</a>.</p>
<hr>
<p>To make the above explanation clearer, suppose we have a system of only 4 charges $q_i$ with $i=1 \to 4$. Between every pair of charges there is an electrical force $F_{ij}$ meaning the force that charge $j$ exerts on charge $i$. </p>
<p>Suppose that charges $i=1 , 2$ constitute one object (which we call "the N hemisphere") and charges $i=3, 4$ constitute a second object ("the S hemisphere"). Then the total force on the N hemisphere due to the S hemisphere is $$F_N=F_{13}+F_{14}+F_{23}+F_{24}$$ The total forces on charges $q_1, q_2$ due to <strong>all</strong> other charges in <strong>both</strong> hemispheres (ie summing over $j \in N, S$) are $$F_1=F_{12}+F_{13}+F_{14}$$ $$F_2=F_{21}+F_{23}+F_{24}$$ If we add the forces on charges $q_1$ and $q_2$ (summing over $i \in N$) we get $$F_N'=F_1+F_2=(F_{12}+F_{21})+F_{13}+F_{14}+F_{23}+F_{24}=F_N$$ because $F_{12}=-F_{21}$. </p>
<p>Thus both methods give the same answer.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3368/force-uniformly-charged-solid-sphere-exerts-other-griffith&show=3399#a3399Mon, 04 Mar 2019 15:02:39 +0000question about 4-velocity
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3396/question-about-4-velocity
<p>A particle is moving in the x, y plane at a speed of v = 0.80 and it is travelling an angle of 60 degrees<br>
above the x-axis.</p>
<p>(a) Rotate the spatial coordinates so that v lies along the x-axis and then construct the components of the 4-velocity for the particle.</p>
<p>(b) Construct the remaining orthonormal basis vectors for the particle in the rotated frame, then rotate the spatial coordinates back to find the basis vectors in the original frame.</p>
<p>(c) Perform the same steps above but this time begin by rotating the spatial coordinates so that <br>
v lies along the y-axis. Do you get the same result for the basis vectors after rotating back to the original frame? Should you? Draw a picture with ~v, the original (x, y) frame, and the two rotated frames to explain what is happening.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3396/question-about-4-velocityWed, 27 Feb 2019 22:32:29 +0000Answered: Rotating ball inside rotating cylinder.
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3359/rotating-ball-inside-rotating-cylinder&show=3395#a3395
<p>I also do not understand the textbook solution.</p>
<p>In an equilibrium situation the ball is effectively rolling down a plane inclined at angle $\theta$ while the plane is itself accelerating upwards along the plane. In the ground frame of reference the centre of mass of the ball is stationary, so the resultant force on it must be zero. However, there is a non-zero torque which causes rotational acceleration down the plane.</p>
<p>The torque acting on the ball is $mgr\sin\theta$ where $r$ is its radius. Its acceleration down the plane, relative to the point of contact, is $r\beta$ where $\beta$ is its angular acceleration. Since there is no slipping at the point of contact, $r\beta$ must also equal the acceleration of the point of contact up the plane, which is $R\alpha$ where $R>r$ is the radius of the cylinder. That is : $$r\beta=R\alpha$$ </p>
<p>The equation of motion for the angular acceleration of the ball is therefore $$mgr\sin\theta=I\beta=\frac25 mr^2 \frac{R}{r}\alpha$$ $$\sin\theta=\frac{2R\alpha}{5g}$$</p>
<p>If there is a finite coefficient of friction $\mu$ then we must also have that $$\tan\theta \le \mu$$</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3359/rotating-ball-inside-rotating-cylinder&show=3395#a3395Wed, 27 Feb 2019 00:00:45 +0000Answered: Electric field far away from a bunch of charges
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3393/electric-field-far-away-from-a-bunch-of-charges&show=3394#a3394
<p>You have not defined the problem well. "A bunch of charges" is a vague description. Both answers could be correct, or neither, depending on the arrangement of charges.</p>
<p>The electric field outside of any general system of charges can be modelled as a <a rel="nofollow" href="http://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/jk1/lectures/node32.html"><strong>multi-pole expansion</strong> </a> of the form $$E=k(\frac{q_0}{r^2}+\frac{q_1}{r^3}+\frac{q_2}{r^4}+...)$$ The coefficients $q_k$ depend on the polar and azimuthal angles $\theta, \phi$ and are related to the <strong>spherical harmonic functions</strong>. The 1st term represents a monopole with the resultant charge on the bunch. The 2nd and 3rd terms represent a dipole and quadrupole respectively.<br>
<img src="https://i.imgur.com/dOpRZgf.png" alt=""><br>
If the "bunch of charges" has an overall non-zero charge $q_0$ then far from the bunch the 1st term will dominate. It will resemble a point charge with an electric field which varies approximately as $1/r^2$.</p>
<p>However, if the bunch has an overall zero charge $q_0=0$ but the centres of +ve and -ve charge do not coincide then the 2nd term will dominate. The electric field far from the bunch is will resemble that of a dipole, which varies as $1/r^3$.</p>
<p>If the centres of +ve and -ve charge do coincide, then the 2nd term will also vanish ($q_1=0$) - for example, 4 charges at the corners of a square, alternating. This arrangement could have a non-zero 3rd term (a quadrupole, $q_2 \ne 0$), for which the electric field is proportional to $1/r^4$.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3393/electric-field-far-away-from-a-bunch-of-charges&show=3394#a3394Mon, 25 Feb 2019 02:07:43 +0000Answered: Electric field intensity at the centre of a solid hemisphere with uniform volume charge density
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3360/electric-intensity-centre-hemisphere-uniform-volume-density&show=3392#a3392
<p>The question is contradictory : It says that the charge density is uniform (the same at every point in the hemisphere), but also that it depends on azimuthal co-ordinate $\phi$, with $\rho=3\phi$. The latter is a very unusual variation, because it has a discontinuity at the meridian $\phi=0, 2\pi$. Perhaps a polar variation is intended, with $\rho=3\theta$, which has no discontinuity.</p>
<p><strong>(a) Uniform Volume Charge Density $\rho=\text{const}$</strong></p>
<p>Divide the hemisphere into rings (hoops) of thickness $dr$ and width $rd\theta$ located at constant values of $r, \theta$ parallel to the xy plane, with the centre as origin. The radius of the ring is $y=r\sin\theta$, its volume is $dV=2\pi y r d\theta dr$ and its charge is $dq=\rho dV$. </p>
<p>The z-component of the electric field due to this ring at the origin is $dE_z=-kdq \cos\theta/r^2$. The total electric field due to all rings in the hemisphere is $$E_z=-\int dE_z=-k\pi \rho \int_0^a dr \int_0^{\pi/2} \sin2\theta d\theta =-\frac{\rho a}{4\epsilon_0} $$ <br>
The total charge on the hemisphere is $Q=\frac23 \pi \rho a^3$ so the electric field can be re-written as $$E_z=-\frac{3Q}{8\pi \epsilon_0 a^2}$$</p>
<p><strong>(b) Polar Charge Density $\rho=3\theta$</strong></p>
<p>Again we can use rings because they have a constant value of $\theta$.</p>
<p>$$E_z=-\int 3\theta dV=-k\pi \int_0^a dr \int_0^{\pi/2} 3\theta \sin2\theta d\theta =-\frac{a}{4\epsilon_0} \frac34 [\sin2\theta-2\theta\cos2\theta]_0^{\pi/2} =-\frac{3\pi a}{16\epsilon_0}$$ </p>
<p>The total charge on the hemisphere is $$Q=\int dq=\pi\int_0^a 3r^2 dr \int_0^{\pi/2} \theta\sin2\theta.d\theta=\frac14 \pi^2 a^3$$ so the electric field can be re-written as $$E_z=-\frac{3Q}{4\pi \epsilon_0 a^2}$$</p>
<p><strong>(c) Azimuthal Charge Density $\rho=3\phi$</strong></p>
<p>We can no longer use rings because $\phi$ is not constant for a ring. The volume element is $dV=r^2\sin\theta dr d\theta d\phi$ and the charge on each element is $dq=3\phi dV$. </p>
<p>The electric field at the centre due to an element of charge at ($r,\theta,\phi$) has components $$dE_z=-k\frac{dq}{r^2}\cos\theta, dE_y=-k\frac{dq}{r^2}\sin\theta\cos\phi, E_x=-k\frac{dq}{r^2}\sin\theta\sin\phi$$ so we get $$E_z=-3k\int_0^a dr \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac12 \sin2\theta d\theta \int_0^{2\pi} \phi d\phi=-\frac{3\pi a}{2\epsilon_0}$$ $$E_y=-3k\int_0^a dr \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac12 (1-\cos2\theta) d\theta \int_0^{2\pi} \phi \cos\phi d\phi=-\frac{3 a}{2\epsilon_0}(\frac{\pi}{4}+1)$$ $$E_x=-3k\int_0^a dr \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac12 (1-\cos2\theta) d\theta \int_0^{2\pi} \phi \sin\phi d\phi=-\frac{3a}{2\epsilon_0}(\frac{\pi}{4}+1)$$<br>
The total charge on the hemisphere is $$Q=\int dq=\int_0^a 3r^2 dr \int_0^{\pi/2} \sin\theta d\theta \int_0^{2\pi} \phi d\phi=2\pi^2 a^3$$ so we can express the components of the field as $$E_z=-\frac{3Q}{4\pi \epsilon_0 a^2}, E_y=E_x=-\frac{3Q}{4\pi \epsilon_0 a^2}(\frac14+\frac{1}{\pi})$$</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3360/electric-intensity-centre-hemisphere-uniform-volume-density&show=3392#a3392Sat, 23 Feb 2019 23:06:15 +0000Answered: What is the fraction of work per second by F is converted into heat.
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3373/what-is-the-fraction-of-work-per-second-by-converted-into-heat&show=3391#a3391
<p>Your equation #1 is $$(R+2\lambda x)i=B\ell v=B\ell \frac{dx}{dt}$$ Solving for $x$ as a function of time, and assuming $x(0)=0$, we get $$R+2\lambda x(t)=R e^{kt}$$ where $k=\frac{2\lambda i}{B\ell}$. The velocity of the bar is $v(t)=v_0e^{kt}$ where the initial velocity is $v_0=\frac{iR}{B\ell}$.</p>
<p>We do not need to find an expression for $F$. And we do not need to take account of a resistive force $Bi\ell$ which the magnetic field exerts on the wire. This is because the motion of the wire in the magnetic field is the cause of the current. The magnetic field does not create a current then exert a force on the same current which it has created. If the current had been generated independently of the magnetic field, <em>then</em> there would be a magnetic force on that current.</p>
<p>No work is done by the magnetic field. Only force $F$ does work. The rate of work $P$ done by force $F$ is the sum of 3 components : <br>
(1) the rate $K$ at which the kinetic energy of the bar is increasing;<br>
(2) the power $Q$ dissipated as heat in the resistors; and<br>
(3) the rate $M$ at which energy is being stored in the magnetic field created by the rectangular loop of current. </p>
<p>Now $M$ depends on the self-inductance $L(x)$ of the rectangular loop, which depends on $x$. Even for such a simple geometry an expression for $L(x)$ is difficult to obtain - see <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/tools/rectangle-loop-inductance-calculator/">Rectangle Loop Inductance Calculator</a> in All About Circuits website. I shall assume without justification that $M \ll P$ is negligible.</p>
<p>$$K=\frac{d}{dt}(\frac12mv^2)=mv\frac{dv}{dt}=mkv^2=mkv_0^2 e^{2kt}$$ $$Q=i^2(R+2\lambda x)=i^2Re^{kt}$$ </p>
<p>The fraction of work done by $F$ which is converted into heat is $$\frac{Q}{P}=\frac{Q}{Q+K}=\frac{1}{1+K/Q}=\frac{1}{1+he^{kt}}$$ where $$h=\frac{mkv_0^2}{i^2 R}=\frac{2\lambda m i R}{(B\ell)^3}$$ This is not constant, it decreases with time. The initial fraction at $t=0$ is $\frac{1}{1+h}$. If the rails have zero resistance ($\lambda=0$) then $k=K=h=0$ so $Q=P$ - ie all of the work done by $F$ is dissipated as heat in resistor $R$, as obtained in <a rel="nofollow" href="http://pleclair.ua.edu/ph102/Exams/Sum_2008/ph102_sum08_exam2_SOLN.pdf">Q4 in this worksheet</a>.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3373/what-is-the-fraction-of-work-per-second-by-converted-into-heat&show=3391#a3391Fri, 22 Feb 2019 17:48:17 +0000Answered: Find minimum distance between dipoles
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3372/find-minimum-distance-between-dipoles&show=3390#a3390
<p>Your error is near the start of the calculation. The distance between diagonally opposite charged masses is $\sqrt{\ell^2+d^2}$ not $\sqrt{\ell^2+(\frac{d}{2})^2}$.</p>
<p>Therefore in your answer $d$ should be replaced by $2d$, giving $n=6$.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3372/find-minimum-distance-between-dipoles&show=3390#a3390Wed, 20 Feb 2019 21:03:31 +0000Find position and velocity at t=0?
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3377/find-position-and-velocity-at-t-0
<p>Full question: </p>
<blockquote><p>An object moves with constant acceleration. At t= 2.50 s, the position of the object is x=2.00 m and its velocity is v= 4.50 m/s. At t= 7.00 s, v= -12.0 m/s. <br>
Find: <br>
(a) the position and the velocity at t= 0;<br>
(b) the average speed from 2.50s to 7.00 s, and <br>
(c) the average velocity from 2.50s to 7.00 s.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I tried using the kinematic equations of motion for constant acceleration but my answers make no sense. </p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3377/find-position-and-velocity-at-t-0Tue, 05 Feb 2019 00:03:55 +0000Answered: Friction between two disks
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=616/friction-between-two-disks&show=3371#a3371
<p>acceleration of both the disc must be same since there is pure rooling <br>
and friction on smaller disc will be downward and on the bigger dics it will be upwards(Newton's 3rd law) and both will be equal in magnitude.<br>
therefore, writting the equation for bigger dics, f(2R)=2R²/2*(alpha)</p>
<pre><code> =>, f=2N
</code></pre>
<p>since the smaller dics has friction (f) as well as a external force due to which it is accelerating with 2m/s² and the external force was unknown initially. But now it also be found by writing the equation for smaller dics and putting f=2N.</p>
<pre><code> "sorry my previous answer was wrong"
</code></pre>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=616/friction-between-two-disks&show=3371#a3371Fri, 01 Feb 2019 07:41:22 +0000Frequency modes of the rectangular shell
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3357/frequency-modes-of-the-rectangular-shell
<p>This is task i received from my professor:</p>
<blockquote><p>The shapes of three natural modes having the frequencies $\omega_1, \omega_2, \omega_3$ of the rectangular shell are presented in the figure. The exciting pressure $p(t)$ applied uniformly all over the one side of the shell has the form $p(t) = Pe^{jωt}$. <br>
Make a sketch of the normal displacement of the gravity point of the shell against frequency, if the excitation frequency varies within bounds $0.5\omega_1< \omega <2\omega_1$ and static displacement of that point equals to $u_0$.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Links to photo of frequency nodes (sorry for low quality)-><a rel="nofollow" href="https://ibb.co/b1nh3j9">1</a> .</p>
<p>Can somebody help me and tell me how i should get started?</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3357/frequency-modes-of-the-rectangular-shellMon, 14 Jan 2019 21:42:44 +0000Answered: tension in wires from which a block is suspended
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3349/tension-in-wires-from-which-a-block-is-suspended&show=3354#a3354
<p>In order to compare $T$ and $W$, one needs to express one in terms of the other. As explained in the diagram itself, since the block is in translational equilibrium, we have:</p>
<p>$$\vec{T_1}+\vec{T_2}=\vec{W_b}$$</p>
<p>Projecting this relation onto the $Oy$ axis, the components of the tensions are both $T\sin\theta$ (because the angle between $T$ and $Oy$ is $\frac{\pi}{2}-\theta$ and the angle between $T$ and $Ox$ is $\theta$). Therefore:</p>
<p>$$2T\sin\theta=W\implies T=\dfrac{W}{2\sin\theta}$$</p>
<p>The information <em>the strings are almost horizontal</em> is equivalent to $\theta\cong 0$. For very small angles, the sine function is as well extremely small, and almost equal to the angle $\theta$ itself. Take a look at the following examples (I've included them here solely to make sure that you understand why $\sin\theta\to 0$ as $\theta\to 0$)</p>
<ul>
<li>$\sin(0.01)\cong 0.00999983333333\cong 0.01$</li>
<li>$\sin(0.0001) \cong 0.00009999999983\cong 0.0001$</li>
<li>$\sin(0)=0$</li>
</ul>
<p>So the denominator $2\sin\theta\cong0$ and therefore $T\to\infty$. As $W=mg$, clearly $W$ is a finite value (making the reasonable assumption that the mass is not inifite), and therefore <em>clearly</em> $T>W$. </p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3349/tension-in-wires-from-which-a-block-is-suspended&show=3354#a3354Fri, 11 Jan 2019 19:52:11 +0000How to solve this throwing ball off cliff question
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3350/how-to-solve-this-throwing-ball-off-cliff-question
<p><img src="https://cdn.pbrd.co/images/HVdO2s0.png" alt=""></p>
<p>For b) I was curious why i couldn't use $s = ut + \frac12at^2$ as my equation as i had all the necessary known values. Instead to get the correct answer i had to use $v=u + at$.</p>
<p>Why is this so? Thank you for your time.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3350/how-to-solve-this-throwing-ball-off-cliff-questionSun, 06 Jan 2019 15:45:23 +0000Time period of small oscillation- disk and particle system
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3346/time-period-of-small-oscillation-disk-and-particle-system
<p><img src="https://cdn.pbrd.co/images/HUWMQA2.jpg" alt=""></p>
<p>Attempt: </p>
<p>$y_{COM} = \dfrac{R}{3} = \dfrac {25}3$</p>
<p>$I = \dfrac 12 (2)R^2 + 1R^2 = 2\times 25 = 50 $</p>
<p>Now, T is given by: $T =2\pi \sqrt{\dfrac{I}{mgl}}$ where l is the distance of the centre of mass from the centre of rotation</p>
<p>So $T =2\pi \sqrt{\dfrac{50}{3 \times 10 \times \dfrac{25}{3}}} = 2\pi\sqrt{\dfrac{1}{5}}$</p>
<p>No option :( </p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3346/time-period-of-small-oscillation-disk-and-particle-systemFri, 04 Jan 2019 22:33:35 +0000Wave optics- number of minimas.
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3345/wave-optics-number-of-minimas
<p><img src="https://cdn.pbrd.co/images/HUWujTQ.jpg" alt=""></p>
<p>Attempt: </p>
<p>Let m be the integer associated with $420 nm$<br>
and n be the integer associated with $540 nm$</p>
<p>$d \sin \theta = k \lambda $ $k\in Z$<br>
Clearly, </p>
<p>$m_{max} = 180$ </p>
<p>$n_{max} = 140 $</p>
<p>$(2m+1) \lambda_1 = (2n+1)\lambda_2$ (condition for dark fringes to overlap)</p>
<p>$\implies \dfrac{2m+1}{2n+1} = \dfrac 97$</p>
<p>$\implies m = \dfrac{1+7n +2n }{7}$</p>
<p>Hence, we obtain, for m to be an integer: $2n+1 = 7k$</p>
<p>$\implies n = \dfrac{7k-1}{2}$ where $k \in Z$</p>
<p>Now note that k must be odd since odd-1 = even </p>
<p>Thus, using $n \le 140$, $k_{max} = 39$</p>
<p>Now, we have to consider only odd values of k which are $1,3,...39$ = 20 numbers </p>
<p>Thus, we have 20 minimas on the upper side and 20 on the lower,<br>
Total minimas = $20+20 = 40$</p>
<p>But answer is $D$</p>
<p><strong>Question 1:</strong> What is wrong with my method? </p>
<p><strong>Question 2:</strong> Considering that this is a JEE Mains problem, what is the fastest 2 minute way to do it? </p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3345/wave-optics-number-of-minimasFri, 04 Jan 2019 22:01:11 +0000Answered: oblique collision of a rigid rod with a plane surface
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3336/oblique-collision-of-a-rigid-rod-with-a-plane-surface&show=3344#a3344
<p>The normal contact impulse $J$ between the rod and plane has two effects : it changes the velocity of the CM of the rod, and it makes the rod rotate about its CM. </p>
<p>The impulsive force is related to the change in momentum of the CM of the rod, and the impulsive torque to the change in angular momentum of the rod, as follows : $$J=m(v_0+v_1)$$ $$J\frac{L}{2}\cos\theta=I\omega$$ Here $v_0, v_1$ are the vertical velocities of the CM before and after the collision, and $I=\frac{1}{12}mL^2$ is the moment of inertia of the rod about its CM. </p>
<p>The rod is not rotating initially. After the collision, the velocity of the end A which collided with the ground is $v_2'=\frac{L}{2}\omega$ relative to the CM of the rod, directed perpendicular to the rod, ie at an angle of $\theta=60^{\circ}$ to the vertical. The CM of the rod is moving upwards with speed $v_1$ so the vertical component of the velocity of A relative to the ground after collision is $$v_2=v_2'\cos\theta+v_1$$ </p>
<p>The elasticity of the collision is known ($e=1$) so the <strong>Law of Restitution</strong> can be applied to the relative velocities of approach and separation at the point of contact : $$v_2=ev_0$$</p>
<p>From the above equations you can eliminate $v_2, v_2', \omega$ to find the rebound speed $v_1$ of the CM of the rod and thereby the height to which the CM rises after collision.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3336/oblique-collision-of-a-rigid-rod-with-a-plane-surface&show=3344#a3344Wed, 02 Jan 2019 22:07:06 +0000Answered: Diffusion with reflecting boundary
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3254/diffusion-with-reflecting-boundary&show=3343#a3343
<p>You have not gone wrong. You simply have not gone far enough.</p>
<p>You have obtained a quartic equation $$z^4-2z+1=0$$ This has 4 solutions, not only the obvious one $z=1$. The solution $z=1$ requires $t=+\infty$ so this is not the solution you require. You need to find some more solutions. Then check which one describes the situation you are trying to find.</p>
<p>In fact there is one other real solution and 2 imaginary solutions. Probably you should solve numerically (this is a physics question, not maths). </p>
<p>One simple method is to make a first guess $z<em>0$ then reiterate $$z</em>{n+1}=\frac12 (z_n^4+1)$$ With an initial guess of $z_0=0.5$ I get the following iterations :<br>
0.5<br>
0.53125<br>
0.5398259163<br>
0.5424604827<br>
0.543295467<br>
0.543562654<br>
0.5436484118<br>
0.543675964<br>
0.5436848186<br>
0.5436876646</p>
<p>These converge to 0.5437, though not quickly. </p>
<p>Alternatively apply the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.sosmath.com/calculus/diff/der07/der07.html">Newton-Raphson Method</a>. Using $$f(z)=z^4-2z+1=0$$$$f'(z)=4z^3-2$$ $$z_{n+1}=z_n-\frac{f(z_n)}{f'(z_n)}$$ again with $z_0=0.5$ we get<br>
0.5<br>
0.5416666667<br>
0.5436837222<br>
0.5436890127<br>
0.5436890127</p>
<p>which converges much more rapidly.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3254/diffusion-with-reflecting-boundary&show=3343#a3343Wed, 02 Jan 2019 16:42:47 +0000Answered: floating cubical block
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3319/floating-cubical-block&show=3342#a3342
<p>I think you have misinterpreted the question. </p>
<p>The copper block is not hollow, it is solid copper. There is nothing inside it except copper. Mercury and water are not poured into the copper block. They are poured into a vessel in which the copper block is able to float.</p>
<p>Initially the copper block is floating inside a vessel (eg a beaker) which contains a layer of liquid mercury at the bottom. Some water is added on top of the mercury, surrounding the copper block, until the water is level with the top of the copper block. Now the copper block is floating in a layer of mercury and a layer of water. The question is asking for the depth of the layer of water. </p>
<p>The words "the copper in the block just gets submerged" in your question should read "the copper block just gets submerged".</p>
<hr>
<p>Mercury is a liquid. Water is a liquid. The LHS of your equation gives the pressure in the mercury level with the base of the copper block (neglecting air pressure). The RHS is the pressure due to copper block, which you can think of as another liquid.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3319/floating-cubical-block&show=3342#a3342Wed, 02 Jan 2019 15:26:29 +0000Answered: Cylinder lying on conveyor belt
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3323/cylinder-lying-on-conveyor-belt&show=3340#a3340
<p>In essence this question has been answered already in <a rel="nofollow" href="http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=470/rotation-in-truck">rotation of wheels and axle in accelerating truck</a>. There I show that the linear acceleration $a_0$ (relative to the ground) and the rotational acceleration $\alpha$ of a solid disk or cylinder which rolls without slipping on a lorry (or conveyor belt) which has translational acceleration $a$ are given by $$a_0=\frac13 a$$$$R\alpha=2a_0=\frac23 a$$ where $R$ is the radius of the cylinder. </p>
<p>The friction force is $$f=\frac13 Ma \le \mu Mg$$ so to avoid slipping the acceleration of the belt must be limited to $a \le 3\mu g$. </p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3323/cylinder-lying-on-conveyor-belt&show=3340#a3340Wed, 02 Jan 2019 08:31:03 +0000Answered: Final charge on the capacitor and Charge on capacitor as a function time
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3311/final-charge-the-capacitor-charge-capacitor-function-time&show=3318#a3318
<p>The diagram is faulty. Switch S1 needs to be in the same branch as the capacitor to prevent it from discharging before S1 is closed. But we can guess what they mean.</p>
<p>Using KVL is not much more difficult than what you have done already. It should give you the correct answer - for example, as follows.</p>
<p>Mark 3 loop currents $i_1, i_2, i_3$ as shown in the diagram below. Then applying KVL around each loop we get $$\frac{Q}{C}=3Ri_1-Ri_2$$ $$-\frac{Q}{C}=4Ri_2-Ri_1-2Ri_3$$ $$E=4Ri_3-2Ri_2$$ We are interested in the current through the capacitor which is $i=i_1-i_2$. Substituting and eliminating $i_1, i_2, i_3$ we obtain <br>
$$i=-\frac{dQ}{dt}=\frac{1}{2CR}(Q-\frac14 CE)$$<br>
$$Q-\frac14 CE=(Q_0-\frac14 CE)e^{-t/2RC}$$ </p>
<p>After a long time ($t \to \infty$) the factor $e^{-t/2RC} \to 0$. Then the charge on the capacitor becomes $Q_{\infty}=\frac14CE$.</p>
<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/y964baO.png" alt=""></p>
<p>A quicker solution is to find the equivalent resistance $R'$ across the capacitor after shorting the cell. The time constant of the decay (or increase) of charge on the capacitor is then $C R'$. If the initial charge is $Q_0$ and the final charge is $Q_1$ then the time-variation of the charge is given by </p>
<p>$$ Q(t) - Q_1 = (Q_0 - Q_1) e^{-t / C R' }$$ </p>
<p>After shorting the cell the circuit can be drawn as on the right above, because B and C are at the same potential. The resistance between C and D is $R$ because this is the result of two resistors $2R$ in parallel. Then the resistance along ADC is $2R$. This is the same as the resistance along ABC. ADC and ABC are in parallel, and have an equivalent resistance $R$. This is in series with the resistor in branch AC. So the effective resistance in series with the capacitor is $R'=2R$. The time constant for the circuit is $CR'=2CR$.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3311/final-charge-the-capacitor-charge-capacitor-function-time&show=3318#a3318Tue, 18 Dec 2018 03:46:46 +0000Answered: A projectile is ejected with vertical speed $v$ from the surface of a planet of mass $M$ and radius $R$
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3295/projectile-ejected-with-vertical-speed-surface-planet-radius&show=3316#a3316
<p>Your mistake is that you assumed that the acceleration due to gravity $g$ is constant. This is only approximately true over distances which are very much smaller than the average distance of the object from the centre of the planet. The equation $y=vt-\frac12 gt^2$ only applies for constant acceleration $g$.</p>
<p>You need to use the conservation of energy. The initial KE plus gravitational PE at the surface of the planet is equal to the final KE plus gravitational PE at any other point such at that where it comes to rest instantaneously.</p>
<p>If the projectile were not fired vertically but instead at an angle to the vertical it would be necessary also to apply the conservation of angular momentum. In this problem the angular momentum is always zero.</p>
<p>If $v=c$ then Special Relativity Theory ought to apply instead of Newtonian Mechanics, so the kinetic energy would not be $\frac12 mv^2$. However this question assumes that Newtonian Mechanics is still valid when $v=c$. The tags for Special and General Relativity are not needed for this question.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3295/projectile-ejected-with-vertical-speed-surface-planet-radius&show=3316#a3316Sun, 16 Dec 2018 00:00:02 +0000Answered: Prove that the vector of acceleration always points towards the origin
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3312/prove-that-vector-acceleration-always-points-towards-origin&show=3313#a3313
<p>This is a very mixed-up question.</p>
<p>Planets move in elliptical orbits. which can be described by the <strong>parametric equations</strong> $$x(t)=a\cos(kt), y(t)=b\sin(kt)$$ However, in these equations <strong>in general t is NOT time</strong>. It is just a parameter with no physical meaning. These equations correctly describe the path ($x,y$) taken by the planet, but not the relations ($x, t$) and ($y, t$) between its position and time. That relation is much more complex, and cannot be described by any simple function.</p>
<p>The only case in which parameter $t$ represents time for a gravitational orbit, for which the force has the form $-K/r^2$, is when the orbit is a circle, ie when $a=b$. Then $k$ is the angular velocity. In general (ie when $a\ne b$) the angular velocity is not $k$.</p>
<p>The equations do give the correct relation between position and time for an orbit of a mass on a spring with zero natural length, ie <strong>a Hooke's Law central force</strong> which has the form $-Kr$. However, even for such an orbit $k$ is not the angular velocity, which is not constant - unless the orbit is circular. </p>
<p><strong>How to show that the vector acceleration always points towards the origin</strong></p>
<p>The functions you have obtained for acceleration are the components of a vector : $$a_x=-k^2x, a_y=-k^2y$$ The magnitude of this vector is $$a=\sqrt{a_x^2+a_y^2}=-k^2r$$ where $r$ is the distance of the object from the centre of the ellipse. This confirms that the central force is proportional to $r$ - ie it is a Hooke's Law force. You need to find the direction of this vector. The gradient of the vector wrt the x axis is $$m=\frac{a_y(t)}{a_x(t)}=\frac{y}{x}$$ This vector passes through the point $(x, y)$ and its gradient is $y/x$. From this information you can conclude that <strong>the force is always directed towards the origin</strong> which is at the centre of the ellipse.</p>
<p>Although the orbit is an ellipse, <strong>it has no relation to a gravitational orbit</strong>, for which the force is always directed towards one focus of the ellipse, where the Sun is located, not towards the centre of the ellipse. </p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3312/prove-that-vector-acceleration-always-points-towards-origin&show=3313#a3313Sat, 15 Dec 2018 22:49:42 +0000Answered: System of two ideal Fermi gases in three dimensions.
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3294/system-of-two-ideal-fermi-gases-in-three-dimensions&show=3310#a3310
<p>It is all about knowing that the ground-state pressure of the ideal Fermi gas is:</p>
<p>$$P_o = \frac{2}{5} n \epsilon_f$$</p>
<p>And actually (after some dimensional analysis), I realised that <strong>equation 19 is wrong</strong> as it should be:</p>
<p>$$p_o = \frac{2}{5}( \frac{3 h^3}{(2s+1)8 \sqrt{2} \pi m^{3/2}})^{2/3} n^{5/3}$$</p>
<p>From that point on, it drags that mistake.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3294/system-of-two-ideal-fermi-gases-in-three-dimensions&show=3310#a3310Thu, 13 Dec 2018 12:13:41 +0000Answered: Radial distribution of particle separation in a liquid at small distances
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3233/radial-distribution-particle-separation-liquid-distances&show=3308#a3308
<p><strong>1. Preference</strong></p>
<p>The spatial distribution of particles settles into a configuration which minimises potential energy. This is achieved when there is some regular structure - for example, <strong>hexagonal close packing</strong>. Gravitational potential energy is far too small on the scale of microscopic particles. The balance is between kinetic energy and electrostatic potential energy as defined by the Lennard-Jones potential.</p>
<p>Ideal gas particles are assumed to have no attraction at all, only "hard sphere" repulsion when they come into contact. The potential function for ideal gas interactions is therefore $U(r)=0$ for $r>2r_0$ and $U(r)=∞$ for $r≤2r_0$, where $r_0$ is the radius of particles so $2r_0$ (twice particle radius) is the minimum distance between the centres of particles.</p>
<p><strong>2. The Nature of the Oscillations</strong></p>
<p>These are not <strong>dynamic</strong> oscillations in the motion of particles (periodic variations with time), like a mass on a spring. So the question about over/under-damping is not relevant - although it is possible some analogy could be made with dynamic oscillations. </p>
<p>These are <strong>static</strong> oscillations in the distribution of inter-particle distances (oscillations in space), like the ripples of a wave function in quantum mechanics, or the ripples in sand on a beach. </p>
<p>$g(r)$ is a probability distribution function. The "oscillations" indicate that there are periodic values of particle separation which are more likely than average (peaks) or less likely than average (troughs). These "oscillations" are not necessarily sinusoidal (harmonic).</p>
<p>High density causes the "oscillations" by restricting the space which particles can move about in. When particles are forced close together they slide into relative positions where they can keep as much motion as possible - ie they form structures such as hexagonal close packing. At low densities particles have plenty of freedom to move about and can occupy all relative positions equally. All values of separation $r$ are equally likely - the probability distribution function is uniform, flat.</p>
<p>The oscillations are not necessarily sinusoidal. The graph you linked does <strong>look</strong> like a damped harmonic oscillation. But it is not an oscillation in time and space like a pendulum, it is a periodic variation in the probability of finding a particle at distance $r$ from an arbitrary particle. It is probably not easy to see it if you look at the particles. It is a statistical variation which shows up when you calculate average the distances, because averaging removes random variations.</p>
<p>The explanation you quoted suggests that the graph is statistical. It has been constructed by taking a snapshot of the jiggling particles, and measuring the distance of every particle from one aribitrary particle, which is chosen as the origin. (Perhaps this is repeated with every particle in turn being used as the origin. This is the same as measuring the distance between every pair of particles.) The distances of every particle from the origin are measured, and a histogram is plotted of the <strong>density</strong> of particles at a distance in the range $r−Δr$ to $r+Δr$ (vertical axis) vs r (horizontal axis).</p>
<p>For a gas you would expect a uniform density distribution. </p>
<p>For a 'cold' 3D cubic crystalline solid you find sharp peaks at separations r which are multiples of $1,\sqrt2, \sqrt3, 2, \sqrt5, \sqrt6, ...$ units. In fact for all $r^2=l^2+m^2+n^2$ with all possible combinations of integers $l, m, n$. In between are ranges in $r$ which have zero frequency - eg 1.25 units. These peaks and troughs extend over a large range in $r$ - ie there is <strong>long range order</strong>. </p>
<p>For a 'hot' crystal these peaks and the troughs in between them are broader and more rounded, like rolling hills and valleys, giving the impression of oscillations. (The unit of spacing also increases as the solid expands.) </p>
<p>For a liquid or amorphous solid there are peaks (and troughs) only at small values of r - ie there is <strong>short range order</strong>. At large values of r the distribution is more uniform like a gas.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3233/radial-distribution-particle-separation-liquid-distances&show=3308#a3308Tue, 11 Dec 2018 20:14:41 +0000Check whether the followings are null, spacelike or timelike
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3275/check-whether-the-followings-are-null-spacelike-or-timelike
<p>(a) <br>
$x^0=\int r^2+z^2d\tau$<br>
$x^1=\int r\sin\theta d\tau$<br>
$x^2=\int r\cos\theta d\tau$ <br>
$x^3=\int z d \tau$<br>
(b)<br>
$x^0= \sqrt3 ct$<br>
$x^1=ct$<br>
$x^2=ct_0 \sin(t/t_0)$<br>
$x^3=ct_0 \cos(t/t_0)$<br>
where $t_0$ is constant.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3275/check-whether-the-followings-are-null-spacelike-or-timelikeSun, 09 Dec 2018 11:01:29 +0000Answered: Rotation of L shaped rods after impulse
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3304/rotation-of-l-shaped-rods-after-impulse&show=3305#a3305
<p>The hardest part of these questions is working out what they mean! Here it is not clear (i) whether joint B is free to translate or is fixed to the ground, and (ii) whether the rods are joined rigidly at B (so that they remain at $90^{\circ}$ at all times), or pinned loosely so the angle between them can change freely.</p>
<p>If the rods are joined rigidly at B then there will be a <strong>torque</strong> exerted on AB by rod BC as well as an impulsive force, and <em>vice versa</em> for AB acting on BC. This is because for two 2D objects to be attached rigidly together, and maintain the same relative positions, they must be pinned at 2 distinct points. The diagram suggests there is only one pin at joint B. Also, Part 2 of the question does not mention any torque. So I think the rods must be pinned loosely at B by a single pin. If this pin is also fixed to the ground then the impulse on AB will have no effect on BC because the reaction at the pin will be transmitted to the Earth, which is so massive that it does not move. </p>
<p>So I think<strong> joint B must be pinned loosely with a single pin and is free to translate</strong>. This makes sense because rods AB and BC can then have different angular velocities (see options in Part 1).</p>
<p>Your attempt assumes the two rods are rigidly connected, which is a reasonable interpretation of the question, but I think for the above reasons it must be wrong.</p>
<p>You are correct about the position of the COM of the 2 rods. But you have made an error in applying the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/parax.html">Parallel Axis Theorem</a>. This always starts with an axis through the COM and gives you the MI about an axis parallel to that through the COM. You have started at end B of the rod, not at the COM, so your calculation is incorrect. You should get $\frac{5}{12}m\ell^2$. </p>
<hr>
<p><strong>Solution</strong></p>
<p>Rod AB is struck at its COM. If it were not pinned to rod BC it would move upwards on the page, without rotating. This tells us that the reaction impulse $K$ at the pin is purely downwards on the page when acting on AB, and purely upwards when acting on BC.</p>
<p>Impulse $K$ acts through the COM of rod BC so this rod does not rotate : $\omega_2=0$. It moves upwards with velocity $v_2$ such that $K=mv_2$.</p>
<p>The impulses on AB can be resolved into a linear impulse $J-K$ acting upwards at the COM and a clockwise couple $K\frac{\ell}{2}$ about the COM. See <a rel="nofollow" href="https://physics.stackexchange.com/q/312523">Is net torque is not zero about all points on the rod for a linearly accelerating rod?</a> The COM of rod AB moves upwards with velocity $v_1$ such that $J-K=mv_1$. It also rotates with angular velocity $\omega_1=\frac{v_1-v_2}{ \ell/2}$ such that $K\frac{\ell}{2}=I_1\omega_1$ where $I_1=\frac{1}{12}m\ell^2$ is the moment of inertia of AB about its COM.</p>
<p>We now have enough equations so that we can find the following unknowns : $$\omega_1=\frac{6J}{5m\ell}, \omega_2=0$$ $$v_1=\frac{4J}{5m}, v_2=\frac{J}{5m}$$ $$K=\frac15 J$$</p>
<p>In Part 1 options A, B, C are correct, and in Part 2 option A is correct.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3304/rotation-of-l-shaped-rods-after-impulse&show=3305#a3305Sat, 08 Dec 2018 12:57:11 +0000Answered: The lean of a motorcyclist
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3273/the-lean-of-a-motorcyclist&show=3276#a3276
<p>The back/front view should look like this :</p>
<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/YGLurfc.png[/img]" alt=""></p>
<p>The vertical forces $N$ and $W$ cancel out. The resultant force is a radial friction force $f$ acting towards the centre of the turning circle. This is the centripetal force.</p>
<p>Another friction force acts tangentially, increasing the tangential velocity. This force is coming out of the page of the back/front view Free Body Diagram.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3273/the-lean-of-a-motorcyclist&show=3276#a3276Sun, 25 Nov 2018 00:56:03 +0000Answered: SHM with elastic collision.
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3260/shm-with-elastic-collision&show=3265#a3265
<p>The free oscillation (without the wall) can be described by $\phi=\beta\cos\omega t$ where angle $\phi$ made with the vertical is +ve to the right, and $\omega=\sqrt{\frac{g}{\ell}}$.</p>
<p>The time $t_1$ taken from $\phi=+\beta$ to $\phi=-\alpha$ is given by $-\alpha=\beta\cos\omega t_1$. So $$\frac{\alpha}{\beta}=-\cos\omega t_1=\sin(\omega t_1-\frac{\pi}{2})$$ $$\omega t_1=\frac{\pi}{2}+\sin^{-1}\frac{\alpha}{\beta}$$</p>
<p>The period of oscillation is $$T=2t_1=\frac{2}{\omega}(\frac{\pi}{2}+\sin^{-1}\frac{\alpha}{\beta})=2\sqrt{\frac{\ell}{g}}(\frac{\pi}{2}+\sin^{-1}\frac{\alpha}{\beta})$$</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3260/shm-with-elastic-collision&show=3265#a3265Fri, 16 Nov 2018 16:23:52 +0000Answered: Angle made by the plane of hemisphere with inclined plane
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3241/angle-made-by-the-plane-of-hemisphere-with-inclined-plane&show=3244#a3244
<p><img src="https://i.imgur.com/8DvcKSs.png[/img]" alt=""><br>
Centroid C is at the midpoint of the axis OA of the hemisphere, ie distance OC=R/2. In equilibrium position C must lie vertically above point of contact P.</p>
<p>Apply Sine Rule in triangle OPC : $$\frac{R/2}{\sin\theta}=\frac{R}{\sin\beta}$$ $$\sin\beta=2\sin\theta=2\sin30^{\circ}=1$$ $$\beta=180^{\circ}-(\theta+\alpha)=90^{\circ}$$ $$\alpha=90^{\circ}-\theta=60^{\circ}$$</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3241/angle-made-by-the-plane-of-hemisphere-with-inclined-plane&show=3244#a3244Mon, 05 Nov 2018 14:15:06 +0000Liquid in a capacitor as dielectric (IE Irodov 3.144)
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3225/liquid-in-a-capacitor-as-dielectric-ie-irodov-3-144
<blockquote><p>A parallel plate capacitor is located horizontally so that one of its plates is submerged into the liquid while the other is over its surface. The permittivity of the liquid is equal to $\epsilon$, its density is equal to $\rho$. To what height will the level of the liquid in the capacitor rise after its plates get a charge of surface charge density $\sigma$?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is a type of controversial problem, as it contains a different answer by the different author, two different answers provided for this are </p>
<p> $$1) \ h=\dfrac{(\epsilon-1)\sigma^2}{2\epsilon_o\epsilon\rho g}$$ $$2) \ h=\dfrac{(\epsilon^2-1)\sigma^2}{2\epsilon_o\epsilon^2\rho g}$$</p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="https://ibb.co/fYmek0">Solution for 1</a> and <a rel="nofollow" href="https://youtu.be/oyfo-TJEG28?t=31">solution for 2</a></p>
<p>Please help!</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3225/liquid-in-a-capacitor-as-dielectric-ie-irodov-3-144Tue, 30 Oct 2018 01:37:42 +0000Answered: Diffusion with an even number of reflecting boundaries
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3211/diffusion-with-an-even-number-of-reflecting-boundaries&show=3220#a3220
<p><strong>(a)</strong></p>
<p>Your prediction is correct. With reflecting boundaries the limiting concentration tends to a uniform distribution. With absorbing boundaries the limiting concentration tends to zero.</p>
<p>The type of boundary makes a difference. The starting concentration is the same, the end concentration is different, so there must be an increasing difference in between the two cases. One similarity is that in both cases the final distribution is <strong>uniform</strong> : with reflecting boundaries it is a uniform non-zero value, with absorbing boundaries it is a uniform zero value.</p>
<p>The question asks you to explain the behaviour at the boundaries. The concentration at the reflecting boundary rises steadily to the final limiting value. I interpreted this as asking about $\frac{\partial c}{\partial t}$. However, perhaps it is asking about $\frac{\partial c}{\partial x}$, prompting you to state that $\frac{\partial c}{\partial x}=0$ as you suggested.</p>
<p><strong>(b)</strong></p>
<p>The limiting concentration is $N/a$, which should be marked on your sketch. It is $N/a$ because concentration in 1D is number of particles per unit length : there are $N$ particles spread uniformly over a length of $a$.</p>
<p>Yes that is a good point : $\frac{\partial c}{\partial x}=0$ at reflecting boundaries. This is not true for higher derivatives. </p>
<p><strong>Why $\frac{\partial c}{\partial x}=0$ at a reflecting boundary</strong> </p>
<p>Consider first the distribution without the RH reflecting boundary. Close to any point the distribution is approximately linear, eg $c=A(\frac{a}{2}-x)+B$ near the RH boundary position $x=+\frac{a}{2}$. The reflection of this concentration in the RH boundary is $c'=A(x-\frac{a}{2})+B$. When the reflecting boundary is replaced, the concentration to the left of the RH boundary is the sum of the unreflected distribution and its reflection, ie $c'+c=2B$, which is a constant.</p>
<p>It is not obvious to me how this condition could explain the limiting distribution. I do not think it does explain it. However, it does fulfill the requirement for a reflecting boundary.</p>
<p><strong>Why the limiting distribution is uniform</strong></p>
<p>Remove the boundaries. Divide the x axis into an infinite number of intervals or boxes of length $a$ to the left and right of the box at the origin between $x= \pm a/2$. </p>
<p>As the initial distribution evolves it spreads into the adjacent boxes, becoming broader and flatter as well as smaller in height. The highest concentration is always in the central box, and concentration falls monotonically in both directions outside this box. After a long time the distribution is far broader than the box width $a$. In each box the concentration is approximately constant, with a small linear decrease or increase to right and left of centre respectively. </p>
<p>When the LH and RH reflecting boundaries of the central box are replaced, the distribution in the central box becomes the sum of the distributions in all adjacent boxes. Distributions in odd numbered boxes are reversed before they are added. Because there are approximately equal numbers of boxes with decreasing/increasing concentrations, and approximately equal numbers of odd and even boxes, the linear increasing/decreasing contributions tend to cancel out more exactly as the number of boxes increases. The constant contributions all add up to another constant function, ie a uniform distribution, which is equal in area to the area under the spreading Gaussian function.</p>
<p>This is an <strong>averaging process</strong>. The distribution is continuously expanded and chopped into an increasing number of slices, and these slices are added together. Every part of the distribution gets mixed with every other part. The differences, such as peaks and troughs, are averaged out.</p>
<p><strong>(c)</strong></p>
<p>I do not see why the author thinks that this problem is the same as drift-diffusion in a square potential well. It is not the same. There is no drift here. The peaks in concentration remain at their initial positions, they do not move.</p>
<p><strong>Why drift does not affect the final distribution</strong></p>
<p>If the initial concentration drifts as well as diffuses then there is no difference in the final distribution, which is again uniform. The reason is that drift does not prevent the distribution from spreading out. It continues to diffuse at the same rate. Also, the peak concentration is confined to the central box; the concentration decays to left and right of the centre just as it did without drift. </p>
<p>The same averaging process as above takes place : the distribution is chopped up into a larger and larger number of slices, which are added together - outer, middle and inner portions of the distribution get mixed together and lose their individual features. </p>
<p><strong>The Boltzmann Equation</strong></p>
<p>The Boltzmann Equation does not seem to be of any use in this problem. It relates particle numbers $n$ and energy levels. In an infinite square well the particle KE does not change because the particles cannot gain enough energy to escape. The kinetic energy of each particle is also fixed : either by definition, or because all collisions which the particle make are elastic. </p>
<p>(In the Random Walk model of diffusion, <strong>ideal</strong> particles change direction at random, without any cause, and keep the same speed. However, real diffusing particles only change direction because of causes such as collisions. These are either collisions with invisible particles, such as smoke particles colliding with much smaller air molecules, or collisions with each other. This leads to a distribution of speeds, such as the <strong>Maxwell-Boltzmann Distribution</strong>. However, for most purposes each diffusing particle is assumed to have the same <strong>root-mean-square speed</strong>.) </p>
<p>Another scenario is continuous boundaries, in which a particle which exits across the left boundary re-enters immediately across the right boundary. The approach to equilibrium is not quite the same as with reflecting boundaries, but the limiting distribution is identical.</p>
<p><strong>(d)</strong> </p>
<p>I do not understand what this is asking for. You already have an expression for $g_n(x,t)$ from earlier. What else is there to be done here?</p>
<p><strong>Why an infinite number of Gaussians is required to model the boundary conditions</strong></p>
<p>The explanation you found seems to be as follows :</p>
<p>Start with a diffusing Gaussian distribution at $x=0$. If you place an identical 2nd Gaussian distribution at $x=+a$ then the RH boundary at the midpoint $x=+a/2$ will always satisfy the boundary condition $\frac{\partial c}{\partial x}=0$ because of symmetry. However, the bc does not hold at $x=-a/2$. </p>
<p>If you add a 3rd Gaussian at $x=-a$ then the LH boundary at $x=-a/2$ is not symmetrical, and neither now is the RH boundary, so the bc does not hold at either boundary. </p>
<p>However, adding more pairs of Gaussians either side of the centre makes the boundaries at $x=\pm a/2$ look more symmetrical. The number of Gaussians either side differs by only one. The final 'odd' Gaussian is so far away that only the tail of this Gaussian overlaps the boundary, so the effect it makes on the bc gets smaller and smaller as it gets further away from the centre.</p>
<p>In the limit, with an infinite comb of Gaussians, both boundaries at $x=\pm a/2$ are symmetrically placed because each has an infinite number of Gaussians on either side of it, every one with its mirror image. There can be at most one extra Gaussian on the opposite side of the centre, but this is so far away that is has an insignificant effect on the bc $\frac{\partial c}{\partial x}=0$, which will again hold.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3211/diffusion-with-an-even-number-of-reflecting-boundaries&show=3220#a3220Mon, 29 Oct 2018 02:46:20 +0000induced charge density at boundary surface
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3216/induced-charge-density-at-boundary-surface
<blockquote><p>The space between the plates of a parallel plates capacitor is filled consecutively with two dielectrics layers $1$ and $2$ having the thickness $d_1$ and $d_2$ respectively and permittivities $\epsilon_1$ and $\epsilon_2$. The area of each plate is equal to $S$ find:<br>
1. The capacitance of the capacitor <br>
2. The density $\sigma'$ of the bound charges on the boundary plane if the voltage across the capacitor equals $V$ and the electric field is directed from layer $1$ to layer $2$.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I managed to find $C_{eq}$ easily, for the second part I don't understand that word " <em>boundary plane</em>", I only know $\sigma'=\sigma\bigg(1-\dfrac{1}{\epsilon}\bigg)$ holds when there would have been just one plate, how to work on two such consecutive plates. Please help.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3216/induced-charge-density-at-boundary-surfaceSun, 28 Oct 2018 05:02:22 +0000Answered: Charges induced on conducting plates.
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3210/charges-induced-on-conducting-plates&show=3212#a3212
<p><strong>Revised Answer</strong></p>
<p>(I have again misinterpreted your question, which is simpler than I had anticipated.)</p>
<p>This question is Problem 3.44 in Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics". A solution is given as Exercise 2 in <a rel="nofollow" href="https://physicspages.com/pdf/Griffiths%20EM/Griffiths%20Problems%2003.43-4.pdf">Physics Pages</a> using <strong>Green's Reciprocity Theorem</strong>, but it is not easy to understand. </p>
<p>In the simplified problem suggested by your author, we have 3 parallel conducting plates A, B, C. The middle plate B carries total charge $+Q$. The other two plates are either neutral or grounded.</p>
<p>Suppose the area of each face of each conductor is $A$ and the surface charges on the left and right faces of plate B are $+\sigma_1$ and $+\sigma_2$ where $\sigma_1+\sigma_2=\frac{Q}{A}$. The surface charges on the adjacent faces of the outer plates A, C must be $-\sigma_1, -\sigma_2$ respectively. This is because there is no electric field inside any of the conductors, so all electric field lines starting on one face of B must end on the adjacent face of A or C.</p>
<p><img src="https://cdn.pbrd.co/images/HKsipIJ.png" alt=""></p>
<p>The electric field due to a plane face with surface charge density $\sigma$ is $E=\frac{\sigma}{2\epsilon_0}$. So the field between B and A is $E_1=\frac{\sigma_1}{\epsilon}$ and that between B and C is $E_2=\frac{\sigma_2}{\epsilon}$.</p>
<p><strong>Assuming plates A and C are either grounded or at the same potential,</strong> then the potential<br>
differences with plate B are equal : $V_{BA}=V_{BC}$ which means that $$E_1 x=E_2 (\ell-x)$$ where $\ell$ is the distance between A and C. </p>
<p>Using the above expressions for surface charge we get $$\sigma_1 x=\sigma_2 (\ell-x)$$ $$Q_1 x=Q_2 (\ell-x)$$ Now $Q_1+Q_2=Q$. Therefore the charges induced on A and C are $$Q_1=-\frac{\ell-x}{\ell}Q$$ $$Q_2=-\frac{x}{\ell}Q$$</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3210/charges-induced-on-conducting-plates&show=3212#a3212Sat, 27 Oct 2018 15:32:09 +0000Answered: Relation between flux through lateral surface of a cylinder and flat parts.
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3192/relation-between-flux-through-lateral-surface-cylinder-parts&show=3194#a3194
<p>Your 1st equation can be interpreted as saying that the flux through the section is equal to $\frac{1}{\epsilon_0}$ times the charge $Q$ contained within a <strong>cone</strong> whose base is the section and whose vertex is the centre of the sphere.</p>
<p>This result can be obtained directly using Gauss' Law. The electric field inside a uniformly charged sphere is radial. So the flux across the slanting curved face of the cone is zero, because this face is radial. The only flux out of the cone is across its base. The electric field across this base varies in magnitude and direction. Nevertheless, the total flux across it equals the charge $Q$ enclosed by the cone divided by $\epsilon_0$.</p>
<p>Your 2nd equation is derived using Gauss' Law and gives the total flux through the surface of the cylinder.</p>
<p>The similarity between the formulas for $\phi_1$ and $\phi_2$ is entirely due to geometry. Gauss' Law says that total flux through a surface of <strong>any shape</strong> containing uniform charge density $\rho$ is $$\phi=\frac{\rho V}{\epsilon_0}$$ The only difference for each shape is the volume $V$.</p>
<p>The volumes of cone and cylinder depend in the same way on base area $\pi a^2=\pi (R^2−r_0^2)$ and height $r_0$. They are both of the form $k r_0 \pi a^2$. For a cone $k=\frac13$ while for a cylinder $k=1$.</p>
<p>You can see by looking at extremes that your conjecture (that the flux through the flat ends of a cylinder is $\frac13$ of the total flux) must be false. For a short fat cylinder ($r_0 \ll a$) almost all of the flux will be through the flat ends. For a long thin cylinder ($r_0 \gg a$) almost none of the flux will be through the flat ends.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3192/relation-between-flux-through-lateral-surface-cylinder-parts&show=3194#a3194Mon, 22 Oct 2018 15:56:31 +0000Answered: Oscillations of a rotating mass on a spring
http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3191/oscillations-of-a-rotating-mass-on-a-spring&show=3193#a3193
<p>The equilibrium length of the spring $r_0$ is not its natural length. $r_0$ is the radius at which the mass orbits the pivot. It increases with $\Omega$.</p>
<p>The question is asking about <strong>oscillations in the radial direction</strong>. </p>
<p>Suppose we have chosen a value for $\Omega$ and the mass is currently at radius $r$. In the rotating frame of reference there is a centrifugal outward force $mr\Omega^2$ and an elastic inward force $k(r-a)$ where $a$ is the <strong>natural length of the spring</strong>. When these two forces are exactly balanced and the mass is rotating at a constant radius about the pivot, this is the equilibrium position. so $$mr_0\Omega^2=k(r_0-a)$$ which you can solve to find $r_0$.</p>
<p>However, we could displace the mass a small distance from its equilibrium position. The forces would then no longer be balanced. If the equilibrium position is stable the mass will return to it with a non-zero velocity, overshoot, and oscillate about the equilibrium position. The frequency $\omega$ of this oscillation is what you are being asked to find.</p>
<p>To find $\omega$ you need to write the equation of radial motion of the mass in the usual form for simple harmonic motion $$\ddot x +\omega^2 x=0$$ To obtain the equation of motion suppose that $r$ is increased by a small amount $x$. Then applying $F=m\ddot x$ we have $$m(r_0+x)\Omega^2-k(r_0+x-a)=m\ddot x$$ This can be simplified by substituting for $r_0$ as found above.</p>
<p><strong>Comment</strong></p>
<p>Energy is not conserved because the motor is doing work to keep the mass, spring and axle rotating at constant angular velocity. For the same reason angular momentum is not conserved either. A constant value of $\Omega$ could otherwise be achieved using a flywheel, or making the mass of the axle very much larger than $m$. In this case energy and momentum are conserved because the system, which is isolated, now consists of the axle, mass and spring instead of only the mass and spring.</p>
<p>If the motor is switched off before the mass is displaced then both energy and angular momentum are conserved. In this case the oscillation frequency would be different, because $\Omega$ would vary as $r$ changes, unless the mass of the axle or flywheel are much larger than $m$.</p>
<p>A related question on this site is <a rel="nofollow" href="http://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3059/spinning-connected-springs-system-feynman-exercises-14-20">Spinning connected springs system</a>.</p>
Physics Problemshttp://physics.qandaexchange.com/?qa=3191/oscillations-of-a-rotating-mass-on-a-spring&show=3193#a3193Mon, 22 Oct 2018 14:47:35 +0000